FREE RELEASE TOOLS

Measure your master the way the specifications define it

Loudness, loudness range, true peak, dynamics, spectral balance, mono behaviour — computed to the published standards, with every convention labelled as a convention. Then your file is really encoded and decoded so you can see what lossy delivery does to your peaks. Nothing is uploaded.

Everything on this page runs inside your browser. No file is uploaded, stored or sent anywhere, and no account is needed. Figures are attributed to their source, and anything that is industry convention rather than a published standard is labelled as such.

Loading the tool…

How this works, and why it matters

The measurements, and where they come from

Integrated loudness follows ITU-R BS.1770: the signal is K-weighted, split into 400-millisecond blocks at 75 per cent overlap, and gated twice — an absolute gate at −70 LUFS, then a relative gate ten units below the ungated mean. Short-term loudness uses the three-second window defined in EBU Tech 3341. Loudness range follows EBU Tech 3342, which uses a different relative gate: twenty units, not ten. That difference is a common implementation bug, and it makes loudness range read too narrow when it is got wrong.

True peak, and why oversampling is not optional

Sample values do not describe the waveform a converter reconstructs between them. Peaks that exist only between samples are real, and lossy encoders reconstruct them. ITU-R BS.1770 Annex 2 sets a four-times oversampling minimum for true-peak measurement; this tool uses eight. If your meter reports sample peak only, it is telling you about the file rather than about playback, and it will let a master through that distorts on every service.

PLR and PSR — useful, and not standards

Peak to loudness ratio is true peak minus integrated loudness across the whole track. Peak to short-term ratio is true peak measured against the loudest three-second window, which is where limiting actually bites. Neither is defined by ITU, EBU or AES. They are mastering conventions, and the thresholds people use — under five units meaning heavy limiting, under three meaning severe — come from practice, not from a document. This tool reports both and says plainly that they are conventions.

What playback normalisation really does

Every major service turns loud content down toward a target and generally does not turn quiet content up. The honest problem is that only some of those targets are published. Spotify documents its figure. EBU R 128 and the AES streaming recommendation are published standards. The numbers circulated for the other services are repeated everywhere and documented nowhere we could verify at source. The table on this page marks each row accordingly, because a confident number from an unverifiable source is worse than an honest gap.

The codec test nobody else runs

Lossy encoders do not preserve sample values. Quantisation and the decoder reconstruction filter mean the decoded waveform can peak above the source — routinely by half a decibel to a decibel and a half on dense material. A master sitting at full scale therefore clips after encoding even though the file never clipped. Most analysers guess at this. This one actually encodes your audio to AAC and Opus in your browser, decodes it back, and measures the decoded peak, so the number you see happened rather than being estimated.

Mono is not a formality

Correlation between the two channels tells you whether they reinforce or cancel. But the number that matters is the level you actually lose when the mix is summed, and this tool measures that directly rather than inferring it from correlation. Phone speakers, smart speakers, laptop playback and most club systems sum to mono or something close to it, so a wide mix that loses several decibels on summing is losing them in front of most of the audience.

Questions and answers

Is my audio uploaded?

No. The file is decoded and analysed by code running on your own device, including the codec round-trip. Nothing is transmitted, nothing is stored, and there is no account. After the page has loaded you can disconnect from the internet and the tool still works.

Why does your loudness reading differ from my meter?

Differences of a tenth or two are normal between implementations. Larger differences usually mean you are comparing different quantities — momentary or short-term loudness against integrated, or an ungated measurement against a gated one. This tool reports integrated loudness with both gates applied, and short-term loudness on the three-second window, separately.

What is a good PSR value?

There is no official answer, which is why the tool labels it a convention. In practice, a peak to short-term ratio above about eight units reads as a dynamic master, five to eight as controlled, three to five as heavily limited, and under three as severely limited. Whether that is wrong depends entirely on the music. The measurement tells you what you did; it does not tell you what you should have done.

Should I master to a specific service target?

Master once, with headroom, and let each service apply its own gain. Mastering separately per service creates versions to manage and chases figures that are mostly undocumented and change without notice. The two numbers worth respecting are the published true-peak ceilings and your own judgement about dynamics.

My codec test says the decoded file clips but my master does not. What do I do?

Lower the ceiling and re-render. Apple publishes a recommendation to leave at least one decibel of headroom for exactly this reason, and Spotify asks for two decibels of true-peak headroom on masters louder than its target. That is the fix; there is no processing that removes encoding overshoot after the fact.

Does this replace a mastering engineer?

No. It measures. It does not decide what the record should sound like, it does not hear the room, and it has no taste. What it does is make sure that whatever you decided survives delivery intact, which is a different and much narrower job.

Apply for review

The numbers are right. Now the record.

Measurement is the easy half. If you want the release behind a team that takes 5% and leaves everything else with you, that starts with an application.

Apply for review

Free to apply. No account is created; a human reviews and replies by email.

The other engineering tool

Same rules: free, no account, nothing uploaded.

Immersive master inspector
Reads the BW64 container and ADM metadata and checks it against the published delivery specification.

The rest of the release toolkit

Everything runs in your browser.

Loudness & true peak checker
See what each service will do to your master.
Cover art checker
Size, ratio, colour mode and store thumbnail previews.
Metadata checker
Artist, title, version and featured credits against store rules.
ISRC & barcode checker
Validate an ISRC and verify a barcode check digit.
Release timeline planner
Work backwards from your release date.