THE HONEST COMPARISON
See it side by side
Feature by feature — the old distributor model, going fully alone, and the Mazufa way.
~ = sometimes, and only on the expensive tier.
WE KNOW WHAT YOU SURVIVED
The old way was built against you
✕ WHAT ARTISTS SUFFERED
✕Fees that are hard to find before you sign
✕Masters tied up by contract terms
✕Long waits with no update after upload
✕Royalties that are hard to trace end to end
✕Support that can be slow to answer
✕Doors that only open for the signed
✓ WHAT MAZUFA ENDS IT WITH
✓Review the current plan, deductions and third-party charges
✓Ownership and licence scope follow the signed agreement
✓Complete applications enter a human-review queue subject to capacity
✓Available reporting depends on partner data and the agreement
✓Contact channel: contact@mazufa.com
✓Eligibility is reviewed for each applicant
This comparison is about the shape of each model, not a scoreboard. Where a figure appears anywhere on this site, it was read from the company's own pricing page or help centre and carries its source and the date it was read; where a company publishes nothing, we say so instead of estimating. Mazufa's own position is the simple part: free to apply, free to release, 0% commission, invite-only, with a person reviewing every complete application. What we do not claim is a platform count, a country count, a partnership with any named service, or editorial placement — those are decisions the platforms make, not us.